The sponsor. Told the board she could not say which on-time number to trust. Sits above both disputants — so the canonical-OTD decision is hers to make.
Org chart
Who reports to whom — and who owns what
The 5 people in this estate, drawn straight from the graph. Each card shows what a person owns and what they steward. The pattern is the finding: 3 of 5 steward data day-to-day, but 0 own a metric.
Builds the TMS shipment-level OTD (94.1%) and owns the Power BI dashboard. Stewards the delivery data day-to-day.
Defends the post-credit, billed-orders OTD (87.7%). 'Money doesn't have a casing problem or a null problem.'
The governance finding, in one chart. Ownership chips are scarce and metric ownership is absent: people steward tables (shipments, invoices, customers) but almost no one owns a metric. The one ownership that matters — the canonical OTD definition — is still only proposed for Dana Reyes and remains unratified. That empty slot is why the board heard two on-time numbers.